Comparison of predictor relationships in 4 pilot areas

Author

Affiliation

Daniel Phoenix

 

Published

Feb. 22, 2021

DOI

template_location <- here::here("Code","lib","cafri","R", "model_updates", "historical_eda_template.Rmd")
output_file <- here::here("Code","lib","cafri","R", "model_updates", "2020_02_24_predictors4.html")
knitr::opts_chunk$set(echo = FALSE)
library(dplyr)
library(tidyr)
library(ggplot2)
library(ggridges)
library(kableExtra)

Evaluation Results

Predictor relationships for WWE, Cayuga-Oswego, Allegany-Steuben, and County3

         agb    precip     tmax      tmin       twi       dem
1  3.4697587 1121.5925 12.92859 0.8456125  5.355704 277.44363
2 19.5579662 1160.2076 15.92774 3.4869194  5.563832 119.10593
3  3.4762709 1216.5747 16.09468 3.9158762  7.975249  83.15464
4  0.3227472 1248.1116 14.86250 3.3499186 16.500410 254.78810
5  0.2649144  921.7726 12.88756 1.5141934  5.761587 530.24988
6  0.4184661 1017.8934 12.49441 2.3197811  7.775458 694.83264
    aspect        slope lt_nbr lt_tcb lt_tcg lt_tcw delta_nbr
1 301.5513 5.778631e+00    567   3415   2149  -1095         2
2 357.4042 5.147649e+00    633   3590   2567  -1005       -18
3 257.2378 4.851384e-01    451   3548   1789  -1467        -4
4 270.0000 1.272222e-14    581    399     33     44        27
5 131.0539 3.851514e+00    732   3915   3113   -618        58
6 251.2559 5.140557e-01    584   3602   2433  -1255         2
  delta_tcb delta_tcg delta_tcw ysd mag       chm
1        13        18        -2   0   0 12.018240
2        19       -73       -59   0   0 19.401939
3       -12       -20        -6   0   0 17.933399
4       -12         0         6   0   0  8.598808
5        88       299       211   3 298  9.337243
6         0        12         8   0   0 17.974751

Plot distribution of sampled AGB

Correlations between predictors and AGB. Many of the predictors are very highly correlated with eachother.

        agb      precip        tmax        tmin         twi 
 1.00000000  0.33921055 -0.12829641 -0.12390777 -0.43258823 
        dem      aspect       slope      lt_nbr      lt_tcb 
 0.18731976 -0.03330817  0.42625512  0.51927622 -0.16219922 
     lt_tcg      lt_tcw   delta_nbr   delta_tcb   delta_tcg 
 0.23059917  0.35632851 -0.23168093  0.04315129 -0.11475153 
  delta_tcw         ysd         mag         chm 
-0.23955341  0.06346557  0.02854266  0.37034591 

COMPARISONS OF AGB-RELATIONSHIPS FROM EACH PILOT AREA

Comparison of AGB vs Precip for each of the 4 pilot areas

Comparison of AGB vs T-max for each of the 4 pilot areas

Comparison of AGB vs T-min for each of the 4 pilot areas

Comparison of AGB vs DEM for each of the 4 pilot areas

Comparison of AGB vs Aspect for each of the 4 pilot areas

Comparison of AGB vs Slope for each of the 4 pilot areas

Comparison of AGB vs TWI for each of the 4 pilot areas

Comparison of AGB vs LT_NBR for each of the 4 pilot areas

Comparison of AGB vs LT_TCB for each of the 4 pilot areas

Comparison of AGB vs LT_TCW for each of the 4 pilot areas

Comparison of AGB vs LT_TCG for each of the 4 pilot areas

Comparison of AGB vs delta NBR for each of the 4 pilot areas

Comparison of AGB vs delta TCB for each of the 4 pilot areas

Comparison of AGB vs delta TCW for each of the 4 pilot areas

Comparison of AGB vs delta TCG for each of the 4 pilot areas

Comparison of AGB vs Mag for each of the 4 pilot areas

Comparison of AGB vs YSD for each of the 4 pilot areas

Comparison of AGB vs CHM for each of the 4 pilot areas

Footnotes